Проект "Земля - Луна": Монография — различия между версиями

Материал из Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics
Перейти к: навигация, поиск
(Books relate to or are similar to this project, the differences)
Строка 19: Строка 19:
== Контакты ==
== Контакты ==
*[http://www.degruyter.com/dg/page/mathemakontakt/mathematics-physics Dr. Christoph von Friedeburg], Editorial Director Mathematics & Physics.
: Phone: + 49-(0)30-260 05 - 210
: Fax: + 49-(0)30-260 05 - 352
: e-mail: vonFriedeburg@degruyter.com
* Julia Lauterbach, Project Editor (Science, Technology & Medicine) (STM)
: DE GRUYTER, Genthiner Str. 13, 10785 Berlin, Germany
: T +49 (0)30.260 05-246
: F +49 (0)30.260 05-184
: julia.lauterbach@degruyter.com
: Important messages: [http://e.mail.ru/cgi-bin/msglist?folder=0&2008203135=#readmsg?id=13352580140000001013&folder=0], [http://e.mail.ru/cgi-bin/msglist?back=1#readmsg?id=13354239930000001021&folder=0]
*[http://www.ima.umn.edu/~efroimsk/ Michael Efroimsky]
== Сроки ==
== Сроки ==

Версия 16:49, 1 сентября 2016


Origin of the Moon. New Concept

Geochemistry and Dynamics



Интернет ссылки




  • Публикация: октябрь 2012 г.
  • Сдача рукописи: 15 мая 2012 г. (сдана)


The definition of the topic

At present, hypothesis of the formation of the Moon from material of the Earth-mantle is a paradigm. It suggests collision of the Earth with a large (Mars-size) body during the first 30-50 million years of the Earth history. This hypothesis, known as the giant impact hypothesis, was coined in the middle of the 1970s and gained acceptance because it provided a simple solution for a number of dynamic and geochemical problems. However, during the course of time some inconsistencies of the impact hypothesis have surfaced. It is not the purpose of this book to make a critical review of the giant impact hypothesis. Instead, we would like to show another mechanism of the formation of the Moon, different from the collision model, which considers the geochemical constraints and results of the dynamic simulation.

The reason for publication (why this book is needed)

The giant impact hypothesis of the Moon formation is very well known, but other possible scenarios are left in a shadow. However, the giant impact hypothesis is incapable of explaining some geochemical aspects of the situation. The book is aimed to explain the competing scenarios and show the alternative possibilities for the Earth-Moon formation. Such a monograph, written in a fair and balanced manner, could be a truly valuable acquisition to the planetology community.

Books relate to or are similar to this project, the differences

  • Origin of the Earth and Moon. 2000. Editors : Robin M. Canup, Kevin Righter. University of Arizona Space Science Series. 555 p. $60.00

This book is compilation of papers of different authors (not a monograph). The book is mainly aimed to support the megaimpact hypothesis, leaving in a shadow other non-ipact possibilities of the Moon origin.

  • Dana Mackenzie. The Big Splat, or How Our Moon Came to Be, 2003, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 0-471-15057-6. $33.95
  • Neil F. Comins. What If the Moon Didn't Exist?: Voyages to Earths That Might Have Been. 1995. $119.22

These books are of popular kind, which is not satisfactory for the specialists in the area.

The audiences the book is aimed

Advanced students, PhD students and researchers in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics and also any non-specialists interested in the problem of Solar system formation wishing to gain an overview in the origin of Earth and Moon.

Professional societies, companies, or other groups which might be interested in the book

  • American Astronomical Society
  • American Physical Society
  • Association of Lunar and Planetary Observers
  • Astronomical League
  • Astronomical Society of India
  • Astronomische Gesellschaft
  • Federation of Astronomical Societies
  • Eurasian Astronomical Society
  • European Association for Astronomy Education
  • European Astronomical Society
  • Europlanet
  • International Astronomical Union
  • NASA
  • Planetary Society
  • Russian Academy of Sciences
  • Royal Astronomical Society of Canada
  • Royal Astronomical Society in London
  • Royal Society of London

And many other societies, companies, groups related to astrophysics and planetary science.

Key journals in the area

  • AIAA Journal
  • American Scientist
  • Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences
  • Astrobiology
  • Astronomical Journal
  • Astronomical Review
  • Astronomische Nachrichten
  • Astronomy
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review
  • Astronomy & Geophysics
  • Astronomy Education Review
  • Astronomy Letters
  • Astronomy Now
  • Astronomy Reports
  • The Astrophysical Journal
  • The Astrophysical Journal Letters
  • Astrophysics
  • Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
  • Astrophysics and Space Science
  • Astrofisika
  • Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society
  • Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India
  • Earth, Moon, and Planets
  • Earth and Planetary Science Letters
  • Geochemistry International
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Icarus
  • Journal of Astrophysics & Astronomy
  • Journal of the British Interplanetary Society
  • Journal of Earth System Science
  • Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada
  • Meteoritics & Planetary Science
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Series A. Mathematical, Physical & Engineering Sciences
  • Physical Review D
  • Pis’ma v Astronomicheskii Zhurnal
  • Planetary Report
  • Planetary and Space Science
  • Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union
  • Solar System Research

См. также